Discipline that holds. Signals that don't soften.
Governance-Lock and Full-Chain are the two pillars of the platform's discipline architecture. Once the evaluation framework is set, it cannot be quietly changed mid-process — and risk signals raised early in the analysis cannot disappear by the time the report reaches the committee.
Decision support, not decision maker
The platform does not make the investment decision. It produces a committee-grade decision support package. The final call always rests with the authorised individual or committee.
Context is locked
Once context, profile and series configuration are selected, the evaluation framework enters governance-locked status. The same file is read differently in different contexts; without a context change, the result does not change.
Signal-loss prohibition
A risk or PARTIAL area flagged in early analysis remains visible as an analytical signal even when the delivery language is simplified. Simplification happens in language, never in signal.
What the framework forbids — by design, not by exception.
Context does not change
Once an evaluation begins, the context cannot be changed. A new context requires a new evaluation.
Profile does not change
The investor profile cannot be updated mid-process. Changing the profile would invalidate the weight matrix.
Extensions are fixed
The list of governance extensions activated in Workflow 0 cannot be expanded mid-process by adding new extensions.
Configuration over user
Even when the user writes a manual step list, the selected Full-Chain configuration is applied. The platform prefers the configuration to the user.
Calibration is not disclosed
The context-based block weight matrix, profile-based evidence thresholds and the full 1,000-criteria list do not leak into delivered output.
Reproducibility
Same file, same context, same profile, same Full-Chain configuration — same analytical tone and decision structure.
A risk signal propagates through every station. It cannot be erased downstream.
Risks detected during analysis are carried — traceably — into the score, the committee package, the executive report and the decision label.
FIG · G.5 Risk Persistence Layer — traceable propagation from analysis to decision label
Signal-loss prohibition
A risk signal flagged at the analytical stage cannot be erased or softened in the committee report. Contradictions, PARTIAL areas and confidence erosion remain visible as analytical signals even when the delivery language is simplified.
Simplification happens in language, never in signal.
Signal-propagation mandate
Each risk signal is propagated across the auditable layer; audit information remains in the quality record. Even when context and profile differ, the propagated signal is preserved in the file history. The revision trail is preserved as the audit record.
Visibility is logged at every stage.
The delivery language may simplify, but the analytical signal does not. Risk and PARTIAL areas are always carried to the committee. The role of the platform is decision support — not a guarantee.